Turf War in Shaw

Comments

Well, I highly recommend reading the article. I found it very interesting, myself, living in Shaw, and working in this nearby "epicenter" he so well described, with all it's shiny new chic-ness.

I disagree with his assessment that Shaw is "long-since-gentrified". Far, FAR from it, and thank goodness for that: it's a wonderful mix of old and new residents, all levels of socio-economic class. And that comes with blessings, and, well, not-so-blessings. But to describe Shaw as "long-since-gentrified" is inaccurate at best; misleading is more like it. This guy clearly knows the area, and cannot be so blind as to describe Shaw as gentrified. "Up-and-coming"? Sure. Transitional? Absolutely. "Long-since-gentrified"? BAAAN! Wrong.

The "Shaw of yesteryear" may have disappeared... but the current Shaw is not accurately described as "a neighborhood with $800,000 homes, chic new eateries, and boutiques that sell purses for $200" alone; that is to paint half a picture. Less than half. A quarter. An eighth! I feel like the author must have been twisting a bit for effect. I encourage him: you don't need to! Describe Shaw as it is, please; you make it sound like it's Dupont, or Georgetown. I enjoyed the article, but let's not twist the facts.

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in

justindc

My Groups

Neighborhood

Explore friends, family, friends & family, or entire neighborhood.

Archives

  • Powered by Vox

twitter